Vaccines are supposed to offer protection against infection, this does not. Trials need time to highlight safety issues and require control groups and placebos. The folks on the initial trial for this were 'unblinded' so they could get the vax so where is the comparison data going to be coming from? Go watch some UK column, I'm done trying to get through to you. None so blind as those too afraid to see. If this was a miracle jab that guarantee eternal life in 99% I'd still not take it. What is it about the fact that I've had a precious bad reaction to a vaccine that you fail to grasp? A 'safe' jab nearly killed me once, and so I'm not giving them a second chance. But why should my refusal concern you if you've had your multiple jabs, you're safe and protected now aren't you?
Comments